🔗 Share this article

Sunday 30 January 1972 remains among the most fatal – and momentous – occasions throughout thirty years of violence in this area.

In the streets of the incident – the images of the tragic events are displayed on the structures and etched in people's minds.

A protest demonstration was conducted on a wintry, sunny period in the city.

The protest was challenging the practice of internment – imprisoning people without trial – which had been implemented in response to three years of violence.

Troops from the Parachute Regiment killed 13 people in the Bogside area – which was, and continues to be, a strongly Irish nationalist population.

One image became especially memorable.

Photographs showed a Catholic priest, the priest, displaying a bloodied cloth in his effort to defend a assembly carrying a youth, the injured teenager, who had been fatally wounded.

News camera operators recorded considerable film on the day.

Documented accounts contains Father Daly informing a reporter that military personnel "appeared to discharge weapons randomly" and he was "totally convinced" that there was no provocation for the discharge of weapons.

The narrative of events was rejected by the first inquiry.

The Widgery Tribunal concluded the soldiers had been fired upon initially.

During the resolution efforts, the ruling party set up another inquiry, in response to advocacy by surviving kin, who said Widgery had been a cover-up.

That year, the findings by the investigation said that generally, the paratroopers had discharged weapons initially and that not one of the victims had been armed.

The contemporary Prime Minister, David Cameron, issued an apology in the House of Commons – declaring deaths were "without justification and inexcusable."

Authorities commenced examine the incident.

One former paratrooper, identified as Soldier F, was brought to trial for homicide.

Indictments were filed regarding the killings of the first individual, twenty-two, and 26-year-old William McKinney.

The accused was further implicated of seeking to harm Patrick O'Donnell, additional persons, more people, an additional individual, and an unnamed civilian.

Remains a court ruling preserving the veteran's identity protection, which his lawyers have maintained is essential because he is at danger.

He stated to the Saville Inquiry that he had exclusively discharged his weapon at persons who were possessing firearms.

This assertion was dismissed in the official findings.

Information from the examination could not be used immediately as evidence in the court case.

In the dock, the veteran was shielded from sight using a privacy screen.

He made statements for the opening instance in the hearing at a hearing in late 2024, to reply "innocent" when the accusations were put to him.

Kin of the deceased on that day travelled from the city to the judicial building daily of the trial.

John Kelly, whose relative was killed, said they always knew that attending the case would be difficult.

"I visualize all details in my mind's eye," the relative said, as we walked around the main locations mentioned in the case – from the street, where his brother was shot dead, to the nearby the courtyard, where one victim and the second person were fatally wounded.

"It reminds me to my location that day.

"I helped to carry the victim and place him in the medical transport.

"I relived each detail during the testimony.

"But even with having to go through all that – it's still meaningful for me."